 |
| Image / seeklogo.com |
not understand this contradiction of Senator Jorge Viana, if Mr. is for the people of Acre, who chose mostly to return to the old time as Mr. abstained in the vote?
Talking to defend around the time that the people chosen by the majority is playing politics, then what about the time change (by the way, until he is good) without consulting the public, this is politics or not?
There is a significant part of the population acriana not elected politicians who represent us, but most elected and therefore have to accept.
Maybe if before imposing such a time that Acre is today, politicians would care to consult the population and propose an experiment in time, the end result would have been different. Maybe it would not be guaranteed.
Worldwide On Line, we live in is easier, some banks, a few companies and entrepreneurs, who earn much, adapt to the time of Brazil, Acre here since some time will have to make another war to return part of Brazil, since we excluded the rest of Brazil, with two and sometimes three hours difference than the Most of the population, which was not consulted, to adapt to an imposed schedule.
The right thing is that once again the population of a demonstration that everything that is imposed or that "shove into your mouth (old adage), people do not usually give and accept your change.
Again I say this here: popular will and SOVEREIGN AND MUST BE OBSERVED.
0 comments:
Post a Comment